Bill.com vs. FreshBooks
Side-by-side on cost, team fit, integrations, and industry coverage. Ranked on fit, never on commission.
Automates approval and payment of software licenses, continuing-education, and vendor bills for the firm.
Cloud accounting and invoicing built for service-based small businesses, with lighter job-costing features than QuickBooks Online but a simpler learning curve for owners who do their own books.
We may earn a commission when you provision a tool through StackMatch. It can't affect rankings — the recommendation engine is structurally isolated from commission data. Read our methodology.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Bill.com | FreshBooks |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost | $100/mo | $55/mo |
| Team size fit | 2-300 emp. | 1-25 emp. |
| Category | Accounts payable & bill pay automation | Accounting & bookkeeping |
| Integrations | 5 | 2 |
| Industries covered | 66 | 1 |
How they differ
FreshBooks is the lower-cost option at $55/mo versus $100/mo for Bill.com — a $45/mo difference. Bill.com appears in more curated industry stacks (66 vs. 1), meaning it fits a broader range of business types. Bill.com offers more integrations (5 vs. 2), which matters if your stack depends on tight connectivity. FreshBooks targets a narrower employee range (1–25) compared to Bill.com (2–300), making FreshBooks the more focused fit if your headcount is inside that band. Neither tool is universally "better." The right choice depends on whether your priority is lower monthly cost, broader industry fit, deeper integrations, or a headcount-specific match.
See the right fit for your business
Run the free audit with your actual headcount and spend to see which tool our blind engine recommends for your stack.
Run the free audit- Lower cost
- FreshBooks
- More integrations
- Bill.com
- Wider team-size fit
- Bill.com
Not a ranking — see "How they differ" below for the fit that matters for you.