Best Mental Health Practice Software: TherapyNotes vs. SimplePractice vs. TheraNest

TherapyNotes is the mental health specialist. SimplePractice is the multi-discipline modern platform. TheraNest is the affordable, straightforward choice. Here's how to pick based on your practice type.

By The StackMatch Research Team

TherapyNotes, SimplePractice, and TheraNest pricing varies by team size — choose based on headcount, not features

~$200-500/moTherapyNotes
~$250-600/moSimplePractice
~$150-400/moTheraNest

All three tools serve the same category. The wrong pick means paying for complexity you don't use — or outgrowing simplicity too fast.

Monthly cost comparison

TherapyNotes: ~$200-500/mo — the mental health documentation specialist

TherapyNotes is in virtually every mental health vertical we curate at roughly $200-500/mo. It's the right choice when you want software built specifically for mental health: treatment plans, progress notes, diagnostic assessments, and insurance billing workflows designed for therapists, not adapted from medical practice management. The note templates are genuinely comprehensive: initial evaluations, session notes, treatment plan reviews, and discharge summaries with prompts that ensure documentation meets payer requirements. The trade-off is modern features: TherapyNotes's telehealth, client portal, and mobile app are functional but less polished than SimplePractice's. TherapyNotes is the wrong choice when modern client experience and telehealth quality are priorities.

SimplePractice: ~$250-600/mo — the multi-discipline modern platform

SimplePractice is priced at roughly $250-600/mo and is the right choice when you operate a multi-discipline practice: psychology, psychiatry, counseling, social work, and wellness services all in one platform. SimplePractice's differentiator is modern UX: the client portal is genuinely beautiful, online booking is seamless, and the telehealth integration is best-in-class. The intake forms are also genuinely useful: customizable digital forms that clients complete before sessions, automatically populating the chart. The trade-off is mental health depth: SimplePractice's diagnostic assessment tools and specialized note templates are lighter than TherapyNotes's. SimplePractice is the wrong choice when deep mental health-specific documentation is essential.

For teams under 50, paying $250-600/mo for SimplePractice means spending significant money on features you may never use — evaluate whether the complexity is actually earning its keep.

TheraNest: ~$150-400/mo — the affordable, straightforward choice

TheraNest is priced at roughly $150-400/mo and is the right choice for solo practitioners, small groups, and practices that prioritize simplicity and cost-effectiveness over advanced features. TheraNest's differentiator is value: core practice management features — scheduling, documentation, billing, and reporting — at a lower price point than competitors. The interface is genuinely intuitive: less complex than TherapyNotes or SimplePractice, with shorter learning curves. The trade-off is depth: TheraNest's telehealth, client portal, and integrations are minimal compared to competitors. TheraNest is the wrong choice for practices that need advanced features, multi-location management, or extensive integrations.

The right platform depends on your actual team size and workflow complexity — match the tool to your headcount, not to marketing promises.

The actual decision rule

  • Mental health-specific documentation and billing are priorities: TherapyNotes is the specialist.
  • Multi-discipline practice, want modern UX and telehealth: SimplePractice is the experience-forward choice.
  • Solo or small group, cost-sensitive, need straightforward tools: TheraNest is the affordable option.
  • Large practice with complex needs: evaluate TherapyNotes's depth vs. SimplePractice's breadth.

Run the free audit to see which mental health platform fits your practice size, specialty mix, and client experience goals — and whether your current system is creating documentation bottlenecks.

Run your own audit
More from the blog