HCSS HeavyJob + Tenna + Samsara: The Excavation Operations Stack That Actually Works
HeavyJob is the true hub of an excavation stack — Tenna and Samsara both feed it, and Foundation, QuickBooks, B2W Estimate, and Trimble WorksOS all connect through it too. Here's what actually flows automatically, and where the real setup friction shows up.
HeavyJob + Tenna + Samsara: the excavation contractor's field ops stack — built around the hub the rest of the stack plugs into
Pricing and integration counts based on current vertical data for a 22-person excavation contractor.
Ask which tools in an excavation stack 'integrate' and the honest answer is: almost everything in Core Operations and Finance eventually routes through HCSS HeavyJob. It's the true hub of this stack, not just one of three tools in a title — Tenna, Samsara, B2W Estimate, Trimble WorksOS, QuickBooks Online, Foundation Software, and Gusto all connect to it directly. That matters because HeavyJob is where the real question about this stack lives: does field data actually reach it automatically, or does someone re-key it.
HCSS HeavyJob is the hub almost every other operations and finance tool in this stack connects through.
What flows cleanly between the three named in this guide
- Tenna's equipment telematics data (engine hours, location, maintenance alerts) syncs into HeavyJob's job-costing module, so equipment time and fuel costs are automatically allocated to the correct job.
- Samsara's fleet tracking for dump trucks feeds mileage and driver hours into HeavyJob's daily time sheets, replacing manual driver logs.
- HeavyJob consolidates production quantities, equipment hours, and labor hours into real-time job-cost reports that project managers review daily instead of waiting for end-of-month spreadsheets.
Direct connections per hub tool
"They integrate" and "they integrate well" are different claims — expect configuration work for multi-job equipment routing and driver-alert conflicts even where the sync is native.
Where the friction actually shows up
- Multi-job equipment moves require manual job-code updates in HeavyJob when Tenna shows an excavator moved to a new site — the GPS location change doesn't automatically reassign the equipment to the new job cost code.
- Samsara's driver-safety alerts can conflict with HeavyJob's labor-hour tracking if a driver is flagged for harsh braking while simultaneously clocked in on a different job code.
- None of these three natively handles general-ledger accounting — you'll still want QuickBooks Online ($90/mo) or Foundation Software ($600/mo) to turn HeavyJob job revenue into clean financials, and which one you pick determines whether that hand-off is a native sync or a manual export.
What connects to HeavyJob beyond this guide's three tools
Direct HeavyJob connections, by tool
| Tool | Connects directly to HeavyJob? | Pillar |
|---|---|---|
| Tenna | Core Operations | |
| Samsara | Core Operations | |
| B2W Estimate | Core Operations | |
| Trimble WorksOS | Core Operations | |
| QuickBooks Online | Finance | |
| Foundation Software | Finance | |
| Gusto | Finance | |
| PandaDoc | Sales & Marketing | |
| eBacon | Finance |
PandaDoc and eBacon are the two Core-Operations/Finance-adjacent tools that don't connect to HeavyJob directly — PandaDoc reaches the estimating loop through B2W Estimate instead, and eBacon reaches field data through Foundation or Gusto. Neither gap is a problem on its own; it just means the data path is one hop longer than it looks from the outside.
The finance hand-off depends entirely on which accounting platform you picked
QuickBooks Online and Foundation Software both connect directly to HeavyJob, but 'connects to' isn't a guarantee of how cleanly job revenue reconciles once it lands there — that depends more on bookkeeping discipline than on which platform you picked. What the integration map does settle is the accounting fork itself: whichever platform fits your public-works volume, the HeavyJob connection is native either way, so that decision (covered in our Foundation-vs-QuickBooks comparison) doesn't cost you anything in integration depth.
Job-cost data flows from Tenna and Samsara through HeavyJob and into whichever accounting platform actually fits your work mix.
Security and admin tools protect the office, not the field data
Google Workspace, 1Password, DocuSign, and Huntress connect to each other but none of them connect directly to HeavyJob or the telematics tools. In practice, that means your password manager and endpoint detection cover the devices staff use to access HeavyJob and the accounting platform — they don't give you visibility inside HeavyJob's own job-cost data or user activity. If you need an audit trail on who edited a job cost entry, that's HeavyJob's own access logs, not Huntress's or 1Password's.
Checking which side of an 'integrates with' claim is actually live is worth doing before you build a workflow around it.
Questions to ask before you assume two tools 'integrate'
- Does the integration move job-cost or equipment data automatically, or is it just single sign-on?
- Is the connection listed on both vendors' side, or only one?
- If you switched your accounting platform tomorrow, would HeavyJob's job-cost sync survive, or would someone rebuild it?
- Who currently owns closing the gap when a multi-job equipment move doesn't auto-update the job code — dispatch, the bookkeeper, or nobody?
The actual takeaway
HeavyJob + Tenna + Samsara is a genuinely good default field-ops combination for a growing excavation contractor — and it's a good default specifically because HeavyJob is already the hub the rest of your Core Operations and Finance stack connects through, not just because these three happen to be popular. But 'good default' isn't the same as 'works with zero configuration,' and the multi-job equipment assignment gap in particular catches contractors off guard.
Good default ≠ zero config — always verify integration depth for your specific job structure and equipment fleet, and confirm which accounting platform's HeavyJob sync you're actually relying on.
Run the free audit to see the full stack we'd build for an excavation contractor your size, with integration fit already factored in.
- What Should a 22-Person Excavation & Site-Work Contractor Actually Pay for Software?
- Foundation Software vs. QuickBooks Online: Which Construction Accounting Platform Actually Fits Your Excavation Company?
- Best Heavy Civil Software for Excavation Contractors
- Signs Your Excavation Contracting Company Has SaaS Sprawl (And What It's Costing You)