StackMatch

Vanta vs. Drata: Which One Actually Fits Your Cybersecurity Consulting Firm?

These two cover the exact same team-size range, so the usual "which one do you outgrow into" logic doesn't apply. The real split is which compliance frameworks your client roster actually needs.

By The StackMatch Research Team

Vanta $750/mo vs. Drata $700/mo — both fit 3-100 employees, so framework coverage decides it

$750/moVanta
$700/moDrata
$1,450/moCost of running both

Pricing for continuous compliance-automation platforms serving client SOC 2/ISO 27001/HIPAA engagements.

Monthly cost comparison

Tenable and Qualys split cleanly on team-size ceiling and engagement type. Vanta and Drata don't give you that shortcut — both are priced for firms of 3-100 employees, so a firm choosing between them can't lean on "which one do we grow into." The actual difference that matters is framework depth, specifically around HIPAA readiness, and which clients you're already running compliance engagements for.

Vanta: $750/mo — built for 3-100 employees

Vanta automates evidence collection for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA readiness engagements, and its HIPAA coverage is the more complete of the two — full framework mapping and evidence automation rather than a partial checklist. That's the $50/mo premium. The failure mode with Vanta is the opposite of underpaying: firms license it for the HIPAA module and then never land a healthcare or health-tech client, paying for framework depth nobody on the current roster needs.

HIPAA-readiness depth, not team size, is the real fork between Vanta and Drata.

Drata: $700/mo — built for 3-100 employees

Drata automates the same core job for SOC 2 and ISO 27001 — continuous evidence collection instead of a spreadsheet audit trail — at $50/mo less, with HIPAA support that's genuinely thinner than Vanta's. The failure mode here shows up mid-relationship: a firm standardizes on Drata, then signs a healthcare or health-tech client that needs a real HIPAA readiness engagement, and discovers the platform can't carry that work — forcing a rushed migration for one client instead of a planned one.

Fit comparison

CriterionVantaDrata
Team size range3-1003-100
Monthly cost$750$700
SOC 2 readiness
ISO 27001 readiness
HIPAA readiness depthFull framework mappingLimited
Automated evidence collection

Running both Vanta and Drata simultaneously costs $1,450/mo — a pure duplicate for compliance automation, usually a leftover from an acquired book of clients that never got consolidated.

The actual decision rule

An illustration of a software audit checklist.

Map your active engagements to the framework each one actually requires before picking a platform.

  • If none of your current or near-term clients need HIPAA readiness, Drata covers SOC 2 and ISO 27001 for $50/mo less with no functional gap for that work.
  • If your client mix includes, or is likely to include, healthcare or health-tech companies needing HIPAA readiness engagements, Vanta's deeper framework support avoids a forced mid-engagement platform switch later.
  • If you're currently running both because of an inherited client base, migrate new engagements onto whichever platform matches your typical framework mix, and let the other wind down as its remaining client contracts end.
  • Don't let a single legacy client's platform preference dictate your firm-wide standard — the $50-750/mo cost of carrying two platforms usually exceeds what it would cost to migrate that one client.

No HIPAA clients on the roster → Drata ($700/mo) saves $600/yr with no functional gap. HIPAA readiness is or will be part of your book → Vanta ($750/mo) for the deeper framework support.

Questions to ask before choosing a compliance-automation platform

  • What frameworks do our current active engagements actually require — SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or a mix?
  • Are we running two platforms because of a genuine client requirement, or because nobody's consolidated since an acquisition?
  • If a healthcare client signs next quarter, can our current platform actually carry a HIPAA readiness engagement?
  • What's the evidence-migration timeline if we switch platforms mid-contract with an existing client?

A lot of "best compliance automation platform" content online is written by, or paid by, the vendor with the bigger affiliate budget — which tends to be the more expensive platform. That's exactly the incentive our engine is built to be blind to; it ranks purely on framework fit for your client mix, not on which vendor pays the biggest bounty.

Run the free audit with your real headcount and current spend to see which one — plus the rest of your stack — actually fits.

Run your own audit
More on cybersecurity consulting firm