Onfleet vs. Circuit for Teams: Which One Actually Fits Your Courier and Delivery Service?

Onfleet and Circuit for Teams solve the identical job on paper. The real fork in the road is route complexity — how many simultaneous stops you're coordinating and how much manual dispatcher judgment still sits on top of the software.

By The StackMatch Research Team

Onfleet $700/mo (5-200 employees) vs. Circuit for Teams $450/mo (3-150 employees) — the overlap zone is 5-150

$700/moOnfleet (5-200 emp)
$450/moCircuit for Teams (3-150 emp)
$250/moPremium for real-time re-optimization

Pricing for last-mile dispatch and route-optimization platforms.

Onfleet and Circuit for Teams solve the identical job on paper — driver dispatch, route optimization, live tracking links, proof of delivery — which is exactly why courier operators default to comparing feature lists and end up unable to decide. The real fork in the road isn't features, it's route complexity: how many simultaneous stops you're coordinating in a day, and how much manual dispatcher judgment still sits on top of the software's auto-assignment.

Monthly cost comparison

Onfleet: $700/mo — built for 5-200 employees

Onfleet's price reflects a platform built to re-optimize routes in real time as new stops get added mid-day — genuinely useful when same-day, on-demand orders are a meaningful share of volume, not just pre-scheduled recurring routes. The common overspend: a courier shop running a small, mostly-fixed daily route plan pays Onfleet's premium for real-time optimization it rarely actually triggers.

Circuit for Teams: $450/mo — built for 3-150 employees

Circuit for Teams strips the interface down to driver assignment and route sequencing without Onfleet's deeper analytics layer — the right tradeoff for a smaller operation that isn't going to spend time reading reporting nobody has bandwidth for. The failure mode runs the other way: fleets that outgrow Circuit's simpler batch-optimization model but stay on it anyway end up with dispatchers manually re-sequencing routes by hand, the exact manual work the software was bought to eliminate.

Fit comparison

CriterionOnfleetCircuit for Teams
Team size range5-200 employees3-150 employees
Monthly cost$700$450
Live tracking links
Proof of delivery
Real-time route re-optimizationBatch only
Reporting & analytics depthDeeperBasic
you are here5122250+

Circuit's ceiling and Onfleet's floor define the real overlap zone — not a fabricated headcount cutoff.

The actual decision rule

  • 3-5 employees: Circuit for Teams is effectively your only option in this pair — Onfleet's minimum fit starts at 5 employees, so a crew this small doesn't clear its floor.
  • 5-150 employees: this is the real overlap zone, where both platforms fit on paper. Default to Circuit unless same-day/on-demand orders are a meaningful share of your volume — real-time re-optimization is the one feature gap worth the $250/mo premium.
  • 150-200 employees: Circuit for Teams tops out at 150 employees. Above that, Onfleet is the only one of the two actually built for your team size.

A courier that pilots Onfleet during a growth push and never fully migrates the drivers still comfortable on Circuit ends up paying $1,150/mo for one job — the single most common overspend in this pair.

Under 150 employees with mostly fixed routes → Circuit for Teams ($450/mo) saves $3,000/yr over Onfleet. Above 150 employees, or if same-day dispatch is a big share of volume → Onfleet ($700/mo) is the only one of the two actually built for that job.

Route-optimization software gets reviewed almost entirely by logistics-industry blogs with affiliate deals attached to the pricier platform — worth knowing before the next "best dispatch software" roundup ranks the $700/mo option first regardless of your fleet size. Our engine doesn't see which vendor pays a bigger commission; it only sees your headcount and current stack.

Run the free audit with your real headcount and current spend to see which one — plus the rest of your stack — actually fits.

Run your own audit