Supabase vs. Neon
Side-by-side on cost, team fit, integrations, and industry coverage. Ranked on fit, never on commission.
Managed Postgres with built-in auth, auto-generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, and storage, letting a small engineering team skip standing up and operating their own database and auth infrastructure.
Serverless Postgres with instant branching and scale-to-zero, letting small teams spin up a full database copy per pull request for testing without paying for idle compute.
We may earn a commission when you provision a tool through StackMatch. It can't affect rankings — the recommendation engine is structurally isolated from commission data. Read our methodology.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Supabase | Neon |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost | $100/mo | $90/mo |
| Team size fit | 1-50 emp. | 1-50 emp. |
| Category | — | — |
| Integrations | 4 | 4 |
| Industries covered | 0 | 0 |
How they differ
Neon is the lower-cost option at $90/mo versus $100/mo for Supabase — a $10/mo difference. Neon appears in more curated industry stacks (0 vs. 0), meaning it fits a broader range of business types. Neon targets a narrower employee range (1–50) compared to Supabase (1–50), making Neon the more focused fit if your headcount is inside that band. Neither tool is universally "better." The right choice depends on whether your priority is lower monthly cost, broader industry fit, deeper integrations, or a headcount-specific match.
See the right fit for your business
Run the free audit with your actual headcount and spend to see which tool our blind engine recommends for your stack.
Run the free audit- Lower cost
- Neon
- More integrations
- Supabase
- Wider team-size fit
- Supabase
Not a ranking — see "How they differ" below for the fit that matters for you.