Harvest vs. Toggl Track
Side-by-side on cost, team fit, integrations, and industry coverage. Ranked on fit, never on commission.
Simple time-tracking and invoicing tool, the lightest-weight option for a small consulting team that just needs billable-hours capture and client invoices.
One-click time tracker with simple reporting, offered as a cheaper, faster-to-adopt alternative to Harvest for teams that don't need built-in invoicing.
We may earn a commission when you provision a tool through StackMatch. It can't affect rankings — the recommendation engine is structurally isolated from commission data. Read our methodology.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Harvest | Toggl Track |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost | $133/mo | $94/mo |
| Team size fit | 2-100 emp. | 1-50 emp. |
| Category | Professional Services Automation (Staffing, Projects & Billing) | Time Tracking & Retainer Billing |
| Integrations | 5 | 4 |
| Industries covered | 3 | 2 |
How they differ
Toggl Track is the lower-cost option at $94/mo versus $133/mo for Harvest — a $39/mo difference. Harvest appears in more curated industry stacks (3 vs. 2), meaning it fits a broader range of business types. Harvest offers more integrations (5 vs. 4), which matters if your stack depends on tight connectivity. Toggl Track targets a narrower employee range (1–50) compared to Harvest (2–100), making Toggl Track the more focused fit if your headcount is inside that band. Neither tool is universally "better." The right choice depends on whether your priority is lower monthly cost, broader industry fit, deeper integrations, or a headcount-specific match.
See the right fit for your business
Run the free audit with your actual headcount and spend to see which tool our blind engine recommends for your stack.
Run the free audit- Lower cost
- Toggl Track
- More integrations
- Harvest
- Wider team-size fit
- Harvest
Not a ranking — see "How they differ" below for the fit that matters for you.