Cloudbeds vs. Mews
Side-by-side on cost, team fit, integrations, and industry coverage. Ranked on fit, never on commission.
Cloud property management system handling reservations, guest communication, and integrated channel management across direct and OTA bookings, sized for small independent inns.
Cloud-native, API-first hotel PMS covering reservations, front desk, and billing, a modern alternative to Cloudbeds favored by design-forward boutique properties.
We may earn a commission when you provision a tool through StackMatch. It can't affect rankings — the recommendation engine is structurally isolated from commission data. Read our methodology.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Cloudbeds | Mews |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost | $425/mo | $550/mo |
| Team size fit | 1-300 emp. | 10-300 emp. |
| Category | Small Property Management System & Channel Manager | Hotel Property Management System (PMS) |
| Integrations | 5 | 3 |
| Industries covered | 2 | 1 |
How they differ
Cloudbeds is the lower-cost option at $425/mo versus $550/mo for Mews — a $125/mo difference. Cloudbeds appears in more curated industry stacks (2 vs. 1), meaning it fits a broader range of business types. Cloudbeds offers more integrations (5 vs. 3), which matters if your stack depends on tight connectivity. Mews targets a narrower employee range (10–300) compared to Cloudbeds (1–300), making Mews the more focused fit if your headcount is inside that band. Neither tool is universally "better." The right choice depends on whether your priority is lower monthly cost, broader industry fit, deeper integrations, or a headcount-specific match.
See the right fit for your business
Run the free audit with your actual headcount and spend to see which tool our blind engine recommends for your stack.
Run the free audit- Lower cost
- Cloudbeds
- More integrations
- Cloudbeds
- Wider team-size fit
- Cloudbeds
Not a ranking — see "How they differ" below for the fit that matters for you.