Comparison

Arborgold vs. LMN (Landscape Management Network)

Side-by-side on cost, team fit, integrations, and industry coverage. Ranked on fit, never on commission.

Arborgold

Tree care and lawn/landscape business software for scheduling, estimating, routing, and invoicing, popular with established arborist companies.

$350/mo
580 emp.
2 integrations
View on Arborgold's site
LMN (Landscape Management Network)

Budgeting, estimating, and crew time-tracking platform focused heavily on true job-cost accuracy for landscape and snow contractors.

$300/mo
5100 emp.
1 integrations
View on LMN's site

We may earn a commission when you provision a tool through StackMatch. It can't affect rankings — the recommendation engine is structurally isolated from commission data. Read our methodology.

Spec comparison

SpecArborgoldLMN (Landscape Management Network)
Monthly cost$350/mo$300/mo
Team size fit5-80 emp.5-100 emp.
CategoryField Service Management (Dispatch, Scheduling, CRM, Invoicing)Landscape & Snow Business Management (CRM, Scheduling, Job Costing)
Integrations21
Industries covered11

How they differ

LMN (Landscape Management Network) is the lower-cost option at $300/mo versus $350/mo for Arborgold — a $50/mo difference. LMN (Landscape Management Network) appears in more curated industry stacks (1 vs. 1), meaning it fits a broader range of business types. Arborgold offers more integrations (2 vs. 1), which matters if your stack depends on tight connectivity. Arborgold targets a narrower employee range (5–80) compared to LMN (Landscape Management Network) (5–100), making Arborgold the more focused fit if your headcount is inside that band. Neither tool is universally "better." The right choice depends on whether your priority is lower monthly cost, broader industry fit, deeper integrations, or a headcount-specific match.

See the right fit for your business

Run the free audit with your actual headcount and spend to see which tool our blind engine recommends for your stack.

Run the free audit