Applied Epic vs. HawkSoft
Side-by-side on cost, team fit, integrations, and industry coverage. Ranked on fit, never on commission.
Agency management system tracking policies, client records, carrier communications, and commission reconciliation across all lines of business.
Flat-fee, independent-agency-focused management system for policy tracking, client records, and commission reconciliation.
We may earn a commission when you provision a tool through StackMatch. It can't affect rankings — the recommendation engine is structurally isolated from commission data. Read our methodology.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Applied Epic | HawkSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost | $800/mo | $450/mo |
| Team size fit | 5-200 emp. | 2-100 emp. |
| Category | Agency Management System (Policy, Client & Commission Tracking) | Agency Management System (Policy, Client & Commission Tracking) |
| Integrations | 3 | 2 |
| Industries covered | 1 | 1 |
How they differ
HawkSoft is the lower-cost option at $450/mo versus $800/mo for Applied Epic — a $350/mo difference. HawkSoft appears in more curated industry stacks (1 vs. 1), meaning it fits a broader range of business types. Applied Epic offers more integrations (3 vs. 2), which matters if your stack depends on tight connectivity. HawkSoft targets a narrower employee range (2–100) compared to Applied Epic (5–200), making HawkSoft the more focused fit if your headcount is inside that band. Neither tool is universally "better." The right choice depends on whether your priority is lower monthly cost, broader industry fit, deeper integrations, or a headcount-specific match.
See the right fit for your business
Run the free audit with your actual headcount and spend to see which tool our blind engine recommends for your stack.
Run the free audit- Lower cost
- HawkSoft
- More integrations
- Applied Epic
- Wider team-size fit
- Applied Epic
Not a ranking — see "How they differ" below for the fit that matters for you.